4.7 Article

Leucinostatins from Ophiocordyceps spp. and Purpureocillium spp. Demonstrate Selective Antiproliferative Effects in Cells Representing the Luminal Androgen Receptor Subtype of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF NATURAL PRODUCTS
卷 83, 期 6, 页码 2010-2024

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.0c00404

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [CA182740]
  2. Office of the Vice President for Research, University of Oklahoma, Norman Campus
  3. Shimadzu Equipment Grant Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structures of four leucinostatin analogues (1-4) from Ophiocordyceps spp. and Purpureocillium spp. were determined together with six known leucinostatins [leucinostatins B (5), A (6), B2 (7), A2 (8), F (9), and D (10)]. The structures of the metabolites were established using a combination of analytical methods including HRESIMS and MS/MS experiments, 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopy, chiral HPLC, and advanced Marfey's analysis of the acid hydrolysate, as well as additional empirical and chemical methods. Compounds 1-10 were evaluated for their biological effects on triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells. Leucinostatins 1-10 showed selective cytostatic activities in MDA-MB-453 and SUM185PE cells representing the luminal androgen receptor subtype of TNBC. This selective activity motivated further investigation into the mechanism of action of leucinostatin B (5). The results demonstrate that this peptidic fungal metabolite rapidly inhibits mTORC1 signaling in leucinostatin-sensitive TNBC cell lines, but not in leucinostatin-resistant cells. Leucinostatins have been shown to repress mitochondrial respiration through inhibition of the ATP synthase, and we demonstrated that both the mTORC1 signaling and LAR-selective activities of 5 were recapitulated by oligomycin. Thus, inhibition of the ATP synthase with either leucinostatin B or oligomycin is sufficient to selectively impede mTORC1 signaling and inhibit the growth of LAR-subtype cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据