4.7 Article

Synthesis, thermal stability and surface activity of imidazolium monomeric surfactants

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 308, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113006

关键词

Cationic surfactant; Fatty acids; Critical micellar concentration (CMC); Electrolytes and monomeric surfactants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The renewable rawmaterial-based imidazoliumcationic monomeric surfactants have been prepared and characterized by FTIR, (HNMR)-H-1 and TGA. The conductometric study of 3-(2-(decanoyloxy)ethyl)-1-methyl-1Himidazol-3-ium-bromide (capric surfactant) and 3-(2-(octadecanoyloxy)ethyl)-1-methyl-1H-imidazol-3-iumbromide (stearic surfactant) with different concentrations at 298K, 303K, 308K and 313K in ethanol; indicates that these surfactants behave as weak electrolytes. The thermodynamic parameters calculated fromconductivity measurements indicate that micellization is favoured over dissociation process. The results of density and viscositymeasurements have been satisfactorily explained by well-known equations with their allied parameters. The surface-active properties of capric and stearic surfactant have been measure at 298K in water and ethanol. The Gibb's adsorption isotherm confirm that derivative of surface tension with respect to natural logarithm of concentration is negative, indicating that adsorption is positive in nature i.e. surface tension of the solution is lowered by addition of surfactant molecules. The thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) indicates that these surfactants are thermally stable up to 370 degrees C. Activation energy for thermal decomposition was found to be in the range of 14.00-26.06 kJ/mol and thermal stability is more for surfactants having higher hydrocarbon chain than lower one. The information collected fromconductance, density and viscosity as well as surface tension measurements has shown that there is significant interaction between surfactant molecules at certain concentration (CMC). (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据