4.4 Article

Electric Field-Induced Release and Measurement (EFIRM) Characterization and Technical Validation of a Novel Liquid Biopsy Platform in Plasma and Saliva

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
卷 22, 期 8, 页码 1050-1062

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2020.05.005

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH/Public Health Service (PHS) grants [UH2/UH3 CA206126, U01 CA233370]
  2. Ronnie Dio Stand Up to Cancer Fund
  3. Center of Applied Nanomedicine, National Cheng Kung University, from The Featured Areas Research Center Program
  4. Canadian Institute of Health Doctoral Foreign Student Award
  5. Tobacco Related Disease Research Program Predoctoral Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electric field-induced release and measurement (EFIRM) is a novel, plate-based, liquid biopsy platform capable of detecting circulating tumor DNA containing EGFR mutations directly from saliva and plasma in both early- and late-stage patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. We investigated the properties of the target molecule for EFIRM and determined that the platform preferentially detects single-stranded DNA molecules. We then investigated the properties of the EFIRM assay and determined the linearity, linear range, precision, and limit of detection for six different EGFR variants (the four most common g.Exon19del variants), p.T790M, and p.L858R). The limit of detection was in single-digit copy number for the latter two mutations, and the limit of detection for Exon19del was 5000 copies. Following these investigations, technical validations were performed for four separate EFIRM liquid biopsy assays, qualitative and quantitative assays for both saliva and plasma. We conclude that EFIRM liquid biopsy is an assay platform that interrogates a biomarker not targeted by any other extant platform (namely, circulating single-stranded DNA molecules). The assay has acceptable performance characteristics in both quantitative and qualitative assays on both saliva and plasma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据