4.7 Article

Open and Closed Structures of a Barium-Blocked Potassium Channel

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 432, 期 17, 页码 4783-4798

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.06.012

关键词

crystallography; molecular dynamics; free energy; binding; polarization

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R0GM062342]
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences from the National Institutes of Health [P30 GM124165]
  3. NIHORIP HEI grant [S10OD021527]
  4. Department of Energy Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  5. National Science Foundation (NSF) [PRAC-1640888]
  6. NIH
  7. Biological Sciences Division of the University of Chicago
  8. Argonne National Laboratory [1S10OD018495-01]
  9. China Scholarship Council [201508210097]
  10. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province [20180550163]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Barium (Ba2+) is a classic permeant blocker of potassium (K+) channels. The external lock-in effect in barium block experiments, whereby the binding of external K+ impedes the forward translocation of the blocker, provides a powerful avenue to investigate the selectivity of the binding sites along the pore of potassium channels. Barium block experiments show that the external lock-in site is highly selective for K+ over Na+. Wild-type KcsA was crystallized in low K+ conditions, and the crystals were soaked in solutions containing various concentrations of barium. Structural analysis reveals open and closed gate conformations of the KcsA channel. Anomalous diffraction experiments show that Ba2+ primarily binds to the innermost site S4 of the selectivity filter of the open-gate conformation and also the site S2, but no binding is detected with the closedgate conformation. Alchemical free-energy perturbation calculations indicate that the presence of a Ba2+ ion in the selectivity filter boosts the specificity of K+ binding relative to Na+ in the external sites S0-S2. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据