4.6 Article

Thermal conductive epoxy adhesive with binary filler system of surface modified hexagonal boron nitride and α-aluminum oxide

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-020-04031-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51603015]
  2. Science Program of Beijing Municipal Education Commission [KM202010017002]
  3. Key Laboratory of Photochemical Conversion and Optoelectronic Materials, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences [PCOM201918]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, we prepared the epoxy-based adhesives with a binary filler system, which was composed of organosilicon modified hexagonal BN (h-BN) and alpha-Al2O3. H-BN platelets and alpha-Al2O3 nanoparticles were decorated by aminopropyl-trimethoxysilane (APTMS) and glycidylpropyltrimethoxysilane (GPTMS), respectively, to form covalent links to the filler/polymer matrix interface. The surface chemical composition was investigated by Fourrier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and thermogravimetry analysis (TGA), which demonstrated that the modifiers were successfully grafted onto the surface of fillers. This modification has been confirmed beneficial to thermal conductivity so that the thermal conductivity of adhesives incorporated with modified binary fillers could reach 0.85 w/m k, which is 10% more than specimen filled with unmodified fillers, because covalent links strengthened the interface and prohibited heat diffusion. Modified Hashin-Shtrikman model was utilized to analyze thermal resistance of the binary filler system, indicating that adhesives filled with modified fillers displayed lower thermal resistance. The enhancement of interface also brought about some other positive effect, especially in the decreasing of dielectric constant (< 4.3 at 1000 Hz) and the low values of dielectric loss tangent (10(-3)) and high electronic resistance (> 10(14)). Furthermore, the mechanical strength is significantly improved when the modified binary fillers were used.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据