4.6 Article

Di-2-pyridylketone-N1-substituted thiosemicarbazone derivatives of copper (II): Biosafe antimicrobial potential and high anticancer activity against immortalized L6 rat skeletal muscle cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF INORGANIC BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2020.111205

关键词

Di-2-pyridylketone N-1-substituted; thiosemicarbazones; Molecular structures; Copper(II); Antimicrobial agents; Viable cell count studies; Antiproliferative study

资金

  1. University Grants Commission under University with Potential for Excellence Scheme (UGC-UPE)
  2. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, India, New Delhi [21(0904)/12-EMRII]
  3. NSF-MRI Program [CHE-1039027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The basic aim of this study pertains to developing antimicrobial or anticancer agents based on N, S-donor organic ligands bonded to metals. In the present investigation, di-2-pyridylketone-N-1-substituted thiosemicarbazone (py(2)tscH-(NHR2)-H-1, Chart 2) thio-ligands were reacted with copper(I) halides in organic solvents yielding copper(II) complexes of stoichiometry, [Cu(N,N,S-py(2)tsc-(NHR2)-H-1)X] (X = I, R-2 = H, 1; Me, 2; Et, 3; Ph, 4; X = Br, R-2 = H, 5; Me, 6; Et, 7; Ph, 8; X = Cl, R-2 = H, 9; Me, 10; Et, 11; Ph, 12); the formation of Cu-II probably occurs through a proton coupled electron transfer (PCET) process. Electron spin resonance, ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy and X-ray crystallography (2, 3, 5, 7, 11) supported a distorted square planar geometry of these complexes. Moderate to high antimicrobial activities of these complexes against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Gram positive bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus and Gram negative bacteria, Klebsiella pneumoniae 1, Salmonella typhimurium 2 and one yeast Candida albicans were recorded. Complexes were found to be biosafe with 88-91% cellular viability. All complexes have shown high anticancer activity against the immortalized L6 rat skeletal muscle cell line with very low IC50 values.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据