4.7 Article

Analysis of Treponema pallidum Strains From China Using Improved Methods for Whole-Genome Sequencing From Primary Syphilis Chancres

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 223, 期 5, 页码 848-853

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa449

关键词

chancre; China; syphilis; Treponema pallidum; whole-genome sequencing

资金

  1. Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [A2018264, B2019022]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2017A020212008]
  3. National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases [U19AI144177, K24AI143471, K24AI134990, R01AI26756]
  4. Yang Biomedical Scholars Award
  5. Clara Guthrie Patterson Trust
  6. Bank of America, N.A., Trustee
  7. Connecticut Children's Medical Center
  8. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [GA17-25455S]
  9. American Society for Tropical Medicine and Hygiene-Burroughs Wellcome Foundation Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully developed a new method for direct TPA whole-genome sequencing from patient samples, overcoming previous limitations due to in vitro cultivation methods. Using this approach, researchers obtained high-quality genome data from Chinese samples and gained insights into the genetic diversity of TPA in China.
Background. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of lreponema pallidum subspecies pallidum (TPA) has been constrained by the lack of in vitro cultivation methods for isolating spirochetes from patient samples. Methods. We built upon recently developed enrichment methods to sequence TPA directly from primary syphilis chancre swabs collected in Guangzhou, China. Results. By combining parallel, pooled whole-genome amplification with hybrid selection, we generated high-quality genomes from 4 of 8 chancre-swab samples and 2 of 2 rabbit-passaged isolates, all subjected to challenging storage conditions. Conclusions. This approach enabled the first WGS of Chinese samples without rabbit passage and provided insights into TPA genetic diversity in China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据