4.7 Article

Construction of TiO2 nanotube clusters on Ti mesh for immobilizing Sb-SnO2 to boost electrocatalytic phenol degradation

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 393, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122329

关键词

Mesh Ti substrate; TiO2 nanotubes; Sb doped SnO2; Electrochemical oxidation of phenol; Hydroxyl radicals

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program [2017YFA0207204]
  2. International Cooperation Project between China and US [21673061]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [21972036]
  4. State Key Lab of Urban Water Resource Environment [2018DX01]
  5. Innovation Team in Key Areas, Ministry of Science and Technology of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An efficient Sb-doped SnO2 electrode featuring superior electrocatalytic characteristic and long stability was constructed by adopting clustered TiO2 nanotubes-covered Ti mesh as substrate (M-TNTs-SnO2). Compared with the electrodes prepared with mere Ti mesh or Ti plate grew with TiO2 nanotube, the M-TNTs-SnO2 exhibited higher TOC removal (99.97 %) and mineralization current efficiency (44.0 %), and longer accelerated service lifetime of 105 h for electrochemical degradation of phenol. The enhanced performance was mainly ascribed to the introduction of mutually self-supported TiO2 nanotube clusters in different orientations. Such unique structure not only favored a compact and smooth surface of catalyst layer which improved the stability of electrode by reinforcing the binding force between substrate and catalyst layer, but also increased the loading capacity for catalysts, leading to 1.5-2.2 times higher of center dot OH generation, the main active species for indirect electrochemical oxidation of phenol. Meanwhile, the transverse electron transfer from TiO2 nanotube to catalyst layer was possibly achieved to further prompt the generation of center dot OH. This study may provide a feasible option to design of efficient electrodes for electrocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据