4.7 Article

Removal of heavy metals from contaminated paddy soils using chemical reductants coupled with dissolved organic carbon solutions

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 403, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123549

关键词

DOC; Fe oxide minerals; Ferrous sulfate; Reductive dissolution; Sodium dithionite; Soil washing

资金

  1. National Science Council, Republic of China [NSC 104-2313-B-197-001-]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study compared the metal extraction capabilities of nine chemical reductants in heavy metal-contaminated soils, finding that sodium dithionite solutions had higher rates of removing Cr, Cu, and Zn compared to other reductants. Additionally, the addition of dissolved organic carbon further increased the removal of heavy metals by complexation.
General acid washing is commonly used to treat heavy metal-contaminated soils, but it is sometimes difficult to achieve remediation aims in severely polluted soils. If we expose the surfaces of Fe oxide minerals to reductive dissolution during washing treatment, more of the metals initially adsorbed to these surfaces will be liberated, which may encourage the removal of heavy metals. Initially, the metal extraction capabilities of nine chemical reductants were compared in ten soil samples polluted by Cr, Cu, Zn, and Ni. Sodium dithionite (Na2S2O4) and ferrous sulfate (FeSO4) were screened for subsequent intensive research. In summary, the Na2S2O4 solutions had higher Cr, Cu, and Zn removal rates than either the FeSO4 or acid solution. Application of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) further increased the removal of heavy metals by complexation. About 15%, 86%, 32%, and 52% of the Cr, Cu, Zn, and Ni, respectively, were removed from the representative soil (M-2) by two-stage washing using 0.2 M Na2S2O4 coupled with 1,500 mg L-1 DOC solution at pH 2.0. Meanwhile, most soil fertility was preserved: ammonium nitrogen was increased 3.9 times; the increase in exchangeable potassium was 33%; and the reduction in available P was only 10%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据