4.7 Article

Potential impact of active substances in non-thermal discharge plasma process on microbial community structures and enzymatic activities in uncontaminated soil

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 393, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122489

关键词

Microbial community; Enzymatic activity; Non-thermal discharge plasma; Soil remediation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21976143, 41977076]
  2. Young Talent Cultivation Scheme Funding of Northwest AF University [Z109021802]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil microbial community structures and enzymatic activity are important indicators for judging biochemical process intensity and soil quality. Non-thermal discharge plasma (NDP), an advanced oxidation technique, has received great attention in soil remediation. Potential impact of NDP treatment on microbial community structures and enzymatic activities in uncontaminated soil samples was evaluated in this study. The NDP treatment significantly altered soil microbial community structures and enzymatic activity. The exposure of soil samples to NDP decreased the enzymatic activities including glutamic acid enzyme, arylsulphatase, leucine enzyme, acetyl glucosaccharase, glucosaccharase, cellulose, phosphatase, and ligninase. The contents of some soil microbes including Gram-negative bacteria, Fungi, Anaerobes, AM Fungi, Eukaryotes, and Actinomycetes also decreased after NDP treatment, as well as the diversity index and equitability index of the soil microbes. In addition, the total phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA), Fungi PLFA, bacteria PLFA, and Actinomycetes PLFA of the soil microbes were also reduced after treatment. Principal component analysis confirmed these changes. Actinomycetes and Fungi were the most sensitive microbes to the NDP, and Phosphatase activity and Cellulose activity were relatively insensitive to the NDP. The potential impacts could be attributed to chemically active substances and ultraviolet irradiation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据