4.7 Article

Ammonium removal using a calcined natural zeolite modified with sodium nitrate

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 393, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122481

关键词

Ammonia nitrogen; Natural zeolite; Adsorption; Sodium nitrate; Calcination

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Protects for Water Pollution Control and Treatment [2017ZX07201004, 21978277]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)
  3. Zhejiang Basic Public Welfare Research Program [LGF19E080009]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [21A20130011104] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ammonium is one of the key factors responsible for the eutrophication of water bodies. The purpose of this study was to remove ammonium from water using a natural zeolite (NZ) modified with sodium nitrate (NaNO3) by impregnation and calcination. The ability of the NZ to remove ammonium from water was determined by single calcination; however, its efficiency was significantly enhanced by impregnation with a NaNO3 solution. Zeolite modified with 3.00 M NaNO3 and calcination at 673 K yielded the best ammonium removal efficiency, which was 39.88 % higher than the NZ alone. The zeolites that were regenerated over six times maintained a removal rate of 79.35-84.79 % by mixing 25.0 mg of the NZ into 50 mL of a 5.0 mg/L ammonium solution. The improved performance of the modified zeolite (q(m), 16.96 mg/g) was mainly attributed to its relatively elevated mesopore volumes and higher ion-exchange capacity that results from nitrate decomposition, oxygen release, and sodiumion exchange. The adsorption kinetics and isotherms are best described by the pseudo-first-order (PFO) and Freundlich model, respectively, and the process was endothermic. The effects of other factors, including coexisting ions, pH, and dosage, on ammonium adsorption were also determined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据