4.4 Review

Effect of vitamin D supplementation on measures of arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

期刊

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 84, 期 5, 页码 645-657

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cen.13031

关键词

-

资金

  1. Monash University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundLow vitamin D has been associated with poor arterial compliance in observational studies. Arterial stiffness has prognostic value for cardiovascular disease risk. The aim of this systematic review was to clarify the literature surrounding the use of vitamin D to ameliorate arterial stiffness. MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of the MEDLINE, Scopus and EMBASE databases for randomized controlled clinical trials investigating the effect of vitamin D supplementation on pulse wave velocity (PWV) and/or augmentation index (AI) as indicators of arterial stiffness. We meta-analysed data and calculated standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using inverse-variance models on RevMan v5.3 software. Study quality was assessed using a modified Jadad scale. ResultsA total of 607 unique records were identified, of which 18 satisfied our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Study quality was high, ranging from 9 to 12 (of 13). Study design in terms of vitamin D dosing protocol (range: 1000-5700 IU/day), follow-up times (range: 1-12 months), sample size (range: n = 29-183) and recruitment strategies varied markedly. Thirteen studies had data for meta-analysis. Vitamin D was associated with nonsignificant reductions in PWV [SMD = -010; 95% CI: -024, 004; P = 017; n = 806 from ten studies] and AI [-015; -032, 002; 008; n = 551 from eight studies]. DiscussionThere is inconsistent evidence to suggest that vitamin D supplementation improves indicators of arterial stiffness. This may be attributable to the heterogeneity in study design. Therefore, large and well-designed randomized studies are required to determine the casual relationships between vitamin D and arterial stiffness and cardiovascular risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据