4.3 Article

Disruption of membrane cholesterol organization the of PIEZO1 channel clusters

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 152, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1085/jgp.201912515

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of New South Wales
  2. Early and Mid-Career Fellowship from New South Wales Health
  3. Australian Government Endeavor Fellowship [5504_2016]
  4. Australian Research Council [DP160103993]
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [APP1135974]
  6. Office of Health and Medical Research, New SouthWales State Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The human mechanosensitive ion channel PIEZO1 is gated by membrane tension and regulates essential biological processes such as vascular development and erythrocyte volume homeostasis. Currently, little is known about PIEZO1 plasma membrane localization and organization. Using a PIEZO1-GFP fusion protein, we investigated whether cholesterol enrichment or depletion by methyl-beta-cyclodextrin (MBCD) and disruption of membrane cholesterol organization by dynasore affects PIEZO1-GFP's response to mechanical force. Electrophysiological recordings in the cell-attached configuration revealed that MBCD caused a rightward shift in the PIEZO1-GFP pressure-response curve, increased channel latency in response to mechanical stimuli, and markedly slowed channel inactivation. The same effects were seen in native PIEZO1 in N2A cells. STORM superresolution imaging revealed that, at the nanoscale, PIEZO1-GFP channels in the membrane associate as clusters sensitive to membrane manipulation. Both cluster distribution and diffusion rates were affected by treatment with MBCD (5 mM). Supplementation of polyunsaturated fatty acids appeared to sensitize the PIEZO1-GFP response to applied pressure. Together, our results indicate that PIEZO1 function is directly dependent on the membrane composition and lateral organization of membrane cholesterol domains, which coordinate the activity of clustered PIEZO1 channels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据