4.6 Review

Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose CT: a Meta-Analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 35, 期 10, 页码 3015-3025

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-05951-7

关键词

lung neoplasms; meta-analysis; mortality; low-dose computed tomography; lung cancer screening

资金

  1. Cancer Center Support Grant [PO30 CA086862]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Randomized controlled trials have evaluated the efficacy of low-dose CT (LDCT) lung cancer screening on lung cancer (LC) outcomes. Objective Meta-analyze LDCT lung cancer screening trials. Methods We identified studies by searching PubMed, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Registry,, and reference lists from retrieved publications. We abstracted data on study design features, stage I LC diagnoses, LC and overall mortality, false positive results, harm from invasive diagnostic procedures, overdiagnosis, and significant incidental findings. We assessed study quality using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. We used random-effects models to calculate relative risks and assessed effect modulators with subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Results We identified 9 studies that enrolled 96,559 subjects. The risk of bias across studies was judged to be low. Overall, LDCT screening significantly increased the detection of stage I LC, RR = 2.93 (95% CI, 2.16-3.98),I-2= 19%, and reduced LC mortality, RR = 0.84 (95% CI, 0.75-0.93),I-2= 0%. The number needed to screen to prevent an LC death was 265. Women had a lower risk of LC death (RR = 0.69, 95% CI, 0.40-1.21) than men (RR = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.66-1.13),pvalue for interaction = 0.11. LDCT screening did not reduce overall mortality, RR = 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91-1.01),I-2= 0%. The pooled false positive rate was 8% (95% CI, 4-18); subjects with false positive results had < 1 in 1000 risk of major complications following invasive diagnostic procedures. The most valid estimates for overdiagnosis and significant incidental findings were 8.9% and 7.5%, respectively. Discussion LDCT screening significantly reduced LC mortality, though not overall mortality, with women appearing to benefit more than men. The estimated risks for false positive results, screening complications, overdiagnosis, and incidental findings were low. Long-term survival data were available only for North American and European studies limiting generalizability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据