4.4 Article

Mortality and cancer incidence among patients treated with recombinant growth hormone during childhood in Israel

期刊

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 85, 期 5, 页码 813-818

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/cen.13131

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ContextThe inconclusive evidence regarding long-term safety of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy underlines the need for long-term large-scale cohorts. ObjectiveTo assess long-term mortality and cancer incidence among patients treated with rhGH during childhood in Israel. DesignA population-based cohort study. SettingData were retrieved from a national register established in 1988. Mortality data from the national population register were available through 31 December 2014. Data on cancer incidence from the national cancer registry were available through 31 December 2012. ParticipantsAll patients 19 years approved for rhGH treatment during 1988-2009 were included. Patients were assigned to three risk categories, according to the underlying condition leading to growth disorder. Main outcome measuresAll-cause mortality and cancer incidence rates were calculated, based on person-years at risk. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated, using the Israeli general population as a reference. ResultsIncluded were 1687 patients assigned to the low-risk category and 440 patients assigned to the intermediate-risk category. In the low-risk category, all-cause mortality and cancer incidence were not significantly different than expected (SMR 081, 95% CI 022-208 and SIR 076, 95% CI 009-273). In the intermediate-risk category, all-cause mortality and cancer incidence were significantly higher than expected (SMR 405, 95% CI 162-834 and SIR 452, 95% CI 122-1157). ConclusionsNo increased risk of mortality or cancer incidence was found in low-risk patients treated with rhGH during childhood. Patients with prior risk factors were at higher risk of both mortality and cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据