4.4 Article

Prevalence of clinically silent corticotroph macroadenomas

期刊

CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 85, 期 6, 页码 874-880

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/cen.13146

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novartis
  2. Cortendo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveThe prevalence of clinically silent corticotroph macroadenomas is unknown. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of clinically silent corticotroph macroadenomas among all pituitary macroadenomas. DesignPatients scheduled to have transsphenoidal surgery for any sellar mass were prospectively evaluated clinically and biochemically. PatientsAdults who were scheduled for transsphenoidal surgery for a sellar mass at a single academic medical centre. MeasurementsPatients were assessed clinically prior to surgery and graded as having typical, mild or no Cushingoid features. They were assessed biochemically by plasma ACTH and 24-h urine free cortisol (UFC). Excised tissue was examined histologically, and pituitary macroadenomas, examined by immunohistochemistry. Patients with corticotroph macroadenomas were classified as clinically silent if they exhibited no Cushingoid features but had elevated plasma ACTH and/or 24-h UFC. They were classified as totally silent if they exhibited neither Cushingoid features nor elevated plasma ACTH or 24-h UFC. ResultsOf 124 patients who had pathologically confirmed pituitary macroadenomas, 20 (16%) had corticotroph macroadenomas. Eight (40%) of these were clinically silent, in that they had no Cushingoid features but could be identified biochemically by elevated plasma ACTH (seven) and/or 24-h UFC (three). Five (25%) were totally silent. ConclusionsA substantial minority (16%) of pituitary macroadenomas treated surgically are corticotroph adenomas. Of these, 40% are clinically silent but can be recognized by elevated plasma ACTH and/or 24-h UFC. Recognizing these adenomas may influence the surgical approach and provide a marker by which to follow the response to treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据