4.4 Article

Life-history, exploitation and extinction risk of the data-poor Baraka's whipray (Maculabatis ambigua) in small-scale tropical fisheries

期刊

JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY
卷 97, 期 3, 页码 708-719

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14425

关键词

Bland-Altman; elasmobranch; life-history; r(max); Indian Ocean

资金

  1. Western Indian Ocean Marine Science Association (WIOMSA) [MASMA/CP/2014/01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Baraka's whipray (Maculabatis ambigua) is a major constituent of small-scale fisheries catch in the south-western Indian Ocean. Despite this, little is known of its life-history or exploitation status. We provide the first estimates of crucial life-history parameters and the maximum intrinsic population growth rater(max), using specimens collected from small-scale fisheries landings in Kenya, Zanzibar and Madagascar (with northern Madagascar representing a range extension for this species). We assess the relative risk of overexploitation by combiningr(max)with estimates of totalZ, fishingF, and naturalMmortality, and an estimate of the exploitation ratioE. The data indicate that Baraka's whipray is a medium-sized, fast-growing, early maturing species, with a relatively long lifespan. This results in a highr(max)relative to many other elasmobranchs, which when combined with estimates ofFsuggests that the species is not at imminent risk of extinction. Yet, estimates of exploitation ratioEindicate likely overfishing for the species, with full recruitment to the fishery being post-maturation and exploitation occurring across a broad range of age and size classes. Thus, Baraka's whipray is unlikely to be biologically sustainable in the face of current fisheries pressures. This paper makes an important contribution to filling the gap in available data and is a step towards developing evidence-based fisheries management for this species. Further, it demonstrates a simple and widely applicable framework for assessment of data-poor elasmobranch exploitation status and extinction risk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据