4.7 Review

Feeling the heat: developmental and molecular responses of wheat and barley to high ambient temperatures

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
卷 71, 期 19, 页码 5740-5751

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/eraa326

关键词

Barley; cereals; high temperature; reproductive development; thermal resilience; wheat

资金

  1. BBSRC [BB/P016855/1]
  2. Royal Society [UF150081]
  3. Waite Research Institute
  4. BBSRC [1654091, BBS/E/J/000PR9779, BBS/E/J/000C0677] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The increasing demand for global food security in the face of a warming climate is leading researchers to investigate the physiological and molecular responses of cereals to rising ambient temperatures. Wheat and barley are temperate cereals whose yields are adversely affected by high ambient temperatures, with each 1 degrees C increase above optimum temperatures reducing productivity by 5-6%. Reproductive development is vulnerable to high-temperature stress, which reduces yields by decreasing grain number and/or size and weight. In recent years, analysis of early inflorescence development and genetic pathways that control the vegetative to floral transition have elucidated molecular processes that respond to rising temperatures, including those involved in the vernalization- and photoperiod-dependent control of flowering. In comparison, our understanding of genes that underpin thermal responses during later developmental stages remains poor, thus highlighting a key area for future research. This review outlines the responses of developmental genes to warmer conditions and summarizes our knowledge of the reproductive traits of wheat and barley influenced by high temperatures. We explore ways in which recent advances in wheat and barley research capabilities could help identify genes that underpin responses to rising temperatures, and how improved knowledge of the genetic regulation of reproduction and plant architecture could be used to develop thermally resilient cultivars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据