4.2 Article

Intersexual differences in density-dependent dispersal and their evolutionary drivers

期刊

JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
卷 33, 期 10, 页码 1495-1506

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13688

关键词

emigration rate; habitat fragmentation; intraspecific competition; Maculinea (Phengaris) teleius; mating strategies; metapopulation

资金

  1. Polish National Science Centre [DEC-2013/11/B/NZ8/00912]
  2. Jagiellonian University [DS/WBINOZ/INO/761]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dispersal is well recognized as a major driver of evolutionary processes in local populations. Nevertheless, dispersal abilities should also be perceived as a life-history trait, being subject to evolutionary changes in response to various drivers. Empirical studies investigating these drivers rarely consider that they may influence male and female dispersal differently. The purpose of our study was to document intersexual differences in density-dependent emigration from local habitat patches. As a model system, we used a metapopulation ofMaculinea (Phengaris) teleiusbutterfly, in which densities of both sexes vary greatly throughout the flying season. Following intensive mark-release-recapture surveys, the parameters and predictors of dispersal were analysed with the Virtual Migration model and the multi-state recapture model. The emigration rate in males was substantially higher in the early season, especially at smaller habitat patches. With the proportion of females increasing with the season progression, males became reluctant to emigrate from their natal patches. In turn, higher female emigration in the later part of the season was most strongly associated with female tendency to reduce intraspecific competition experienced by their offspring. Our findings provide evidence for the impact of reproductive strategies on dispersal in both sexes. The difference in reproductive strategies of males and females explains sex-biased dispersal in different parts of the season, which carries important implications for metapopulation functioning.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据