4.7 Article

Large area electrochromic displays with ultrafast response speed and high contrast using solution-processable and patternable honeycomb-like polyaniline nanostructures

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2020.114248

关键词

Solution-processable; Honeycomb-like; Polyaniline; Nanostructures; Electrochromic displays

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21876119, 51721091]
  2. Sichuan Province Science and Technology Foundation [2020YFG0094]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electrochromic displays have attained considerable attention attributed to the low energy consumption and open-circuit memory effects. However, the low optical contrast and slow response speed have limited their application fields. To overcome these deficiencies, we focus on the preparation of solution-processable nanostructured electrochromic materials with high contrast and fast response speed. Here, the solution-processable honeycomb-like polyaniline (H-PANI) nanostructure networks were prepared by the combination of chemical oxidative polymerization and template method for the first time. The H-PANI nanostructured film shows improved electrochromic properties owing to large interface area and short diffusion length. And the all-solid-state electrochromic device (ECD-HP) was fabricated by employing spray-coated H-PANI as coloring electrode and spray-coated commercial PEDOT:PSS as counter electrode. The ECD-HP shows high optical contrast (71.6% at 600 nm), ultrafast response speed (447 ms for coloring and 650 ms for bleaching), high coloration efficiency (560.6 cm(2)/C) and remarkable cycling stability (sustaining 96% of its initial optical contrast after cycling 1000 cycles). Furthermore, the large-area patterned electrochromic displays based on H-PANI film were successfully assembled by spray-coating method using masks to form patterns. These demonstrate solution-processable H-PANI could have widely applications in large area patternable electrochromic smart windows and displays.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据