4.3 Article

The effect of oral isotretinoin therapy on meibomian gland morphology and dry eye tests

期刊

JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 762-768

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2020.1774041

关键词

Acne vulgaris; dry eye disease; isotretinoin; meibography; meibomian gland dysfunction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effects of oral isotretinoin on meibomian gland morphology and its relation with clinical dry eye tests. The results showed that non-contact meibography imaging is a useful method for assessing isotretinoin-related changes in meibomian glands.
Purpose:The aim of study was to evaluate the effects of oral isotretinoin on meibomian gland (MG) morphology detected with non-contact meibography and to investigate its relation with clinical dry eye tests. Methods:Forty-five acne patients treated with isotretinoin underwent a full ophthalmological examination at baseline and in the fourth month as follows: ocular surface disease index (OSDI) questionnaire, assessments of tear film break-up time (TFBUT), corneal fluorescein staining, Schirmer test, meibum expression, and lid margin abnormalities. Non-contact meibography imaging and noninvasive tear break up time (NI-BUT) assessments were also performed. The changes in MGs were scored (meibography score) as grade 0, no change; grade 1, mild; grade 2, moderate; and grade 3, marked. Results:There was a statistically significant change in OSDI, corneal fluorescein staining, lid margin abnormality, and meibum expression score during the treatment compared to baseline values (p < .001,p = .02,p < .001, andp < .001, respectively). All meibography scores showed a positive correlation with the lid margin abnormality and meibum expression score but did not correlate with the TFBUT, NI-BUT, Schirmer test, or the corneal fluorescein staining score. Conclusion:The morphologic analysis using non-contact meibography is a useful method for assessing isotretinoin-related changes in MGs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据