4.7 Article

Phosphatidylcholine-depleted lecithin: A clean-label low-HLB emulsifier to replace PGPR in w/o and w/o/w emulsions

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 581, 期 -, 页码 836-846

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.07.149

关键词

Inverse emulsion; Double emulsion; Multiple emulsion; Encapsulation; Lecithin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study revealed that the composition of oil phase and phospholipids can influence the characteristics of w/o emulsions and w/o/w emulsions. Additionally, the hydrophilic emulsifier was found to have an impact on the properties of w/o/w emulsions.
Hypothesis: In contrast to when polyglycerol polyricinoleate (PGPR) is used as lipophilic emulsifier, the used oil phase and phospholipid composition have a strong influence on the characteristics of water-in-oil (w/o) emulsions prepared using lecithin. These parameters are also expected to influence the characteristics of the corresponding water-in-oil-in-water (w/o/w) emulsions. Moreover, a hydrophilic emulsifier is typically added to the external water phase of w/o/w emulsions and is also expected to influence the characteristics of the w/o/w emulsions. Experiments: Lecithin with a varying phospholipid composition was used to prepare w/o emulsions with medium chain triglyceride (MCT) oil as well as long chain triglyceride (LCT) oil. In case the w/o emulsion was stable, w/o/w emulsions were produced as well. Hereby, the w/o/w emulsions were prepared using different hydrophilic emulsifiers. Findings: Each of the lecithin samples could be used to produce a stable w/o emulsion in MCT-oil. In contrast, a stable w/o emulsion could only be produced in LCT-oil with phosphatidylcholine depleted lecithin. The storage stability of the w/o/w emulsions was also higher in case MCT-oil was used as compared to LCT-oil. Finally, a remarkable influence of the high-HLB emulsifier on the resulting enclosed water volume fraction in the w/o/w emulsions was observed. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据