4.7 Article

A novel intratumoral pH/redox-dual-responsive nanoplatform for cancer MR imaging and therapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 573, 期 -, 页码 263-277

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.04.026

关键词

Cancer theranostics; pH/redox-dual-responsive; Charge-reversal; Controlled release; Magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51773055, 51503060, 51973053]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M660178]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The integration of diagnostic and therapeutic functions in a nanoplatform has been a rapidly emerging method in the management of cancer. The application of imaging technology paves the way to track the pharmacokinetics of the nanoplatforms, to guide the treatment, and to monitor the therapeutic processes and outcomes. Herein, we reported a novel type of monodisperses mesoporous silica-coated superparamagnetic iron oxide-based multifunctional nanoplatform (DOX@MMSN-SS-PEI-cit) for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. The fabrication process included the surface modification of monodisperses mesoporous silica nanoparticle (MMSN) with branched polyethyleneimine (PEI) via disulfide bonds and the further coupling of citraconic anhydride to PEI. Typically, the hydrolysis of amide bonds in the tumor microenvironment (TME) could lead to a negative-to-positive charge reversion, which can enhance the endosomal escape of the resulting nanoplatform. The rapid release of doxorubicin hydrochloride (DOX) directly killed the cancer cells. Due to the superparamagnetic iron oxide-based high-resolution T-2-weighted MR imaging contrast agents, this novel multifunctional nanoplatform successfully realized MR imaging, targeted drug delivery and controlled release in one system, and achieved significant improvement in tumor diagnosis and therapy. In summary, the therapeutic nanoplatform is a promising option in precise cancer treatment. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据