4.7 Article

Photothermal hierarchical carbon nanotube/reduced graphene oxide microspherical aerogels with radially orientated microchannels for efficient cleanup of crude oil spills

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 570, 期 -, 页码 61-71

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.02.097

关键词

Microspherical aerogels; Photothermal conversion effect; Reduced graphene oxide

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51972015, 51533001, U1905217]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0801302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High viscosity and low fluidity of heavy crude oils usually hinder their rapid diffusion into porous adsorbents, causing a low efficiency of oil spill remediation. Photothermal effect is thus adopted to rapidly reduce the viscosity of heavy crude oil by in situ solar light heating. Photothermal carbon nanotube/reduced graphene oxide (CNT/RGO) microspherical aerogels are synthesized by fabrication of graphene oxide (GO)-based microspherical aerogels with numerous radially orientated microchannels, followed by growing CNTs inside the microchannels and high-temperature reduction of the GO components. Thanks to the efficient photothermal conversion effect and the rough and oleophilic surface of the microchannels with large surface area, such aerogels facilitate the solar light absorption and hence enhance the crude oil adsorption. Furthermore, the CNTs grown on the RGO skeleton by a chemical vapor deposition approach promote the photothermal conversion efficiency by trapping and absorbing broadband solar light. Under 1 sun irradiation, the surface temperature of the aerogel quickly rises to 83 degrees C in 1 min, resulting in a sharp decrease in crude oil viscosity. The optimal microspherical aerogels deliver an extraordinary adsorption capacity of heavy crude oil, up to 267 g g(-1) within 10 min, superior to those of other oil adsorbents reported so far. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据