4.6 Article

Improved diagnosis of viral encephalitis in adult and pediatric hematological patients using viral metagenomics

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL VIROLOGY
卷 130, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104566

关键词

Viral metagenomic sequencing; Encephalitis; Hematological patients; Virus capture probes

类别

资金

  1. Leiden University Fund/Den Dulk-Moermans Fonds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metagenomic sequencing is a powerful technique that enables detection of the full spectrum of pathogens present in any specimen in a single test. Hence, metagenomics is increasingly being applied for detection of viruses in clinical cases with suspected infections of unknown etiology and a large number of relevant potential causes. This is typically the case in patients presenting with encephalitis, in particular when immunity is impaired by underlying disorders. In this study, viral metagenomics has been applied to a cohort of hematological patients with encephalitis of unknown origin. Because viral loads in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with encephalitis are generally low, the technical performance of a metagenomic sequencing protocol with viral enrichment by capture probes targeting all known vertebrate viral sequences was studied. Subsequently, the optimized viral metagenomics protocol was applied to a cohort of hematological patients with encephalitis of unknown origin. Viral enrichment by capture probes increased the viral sequence read count of metagenomics on cerebrospinal fluid samples 100 - 10.000 fold, compared to unenriched metagenomic sequencing. In five out of 41 (12%) hematological patients with encephalitis, a virus was detected by viral metagenomics which had not been detected by current routine diagnostics. BK polyomavirus, hepatitis E virus, human herpes virus-6 and Epstein Barr virus were identified by this unbiased metagenomic approach. This study demonstrated that hematological patients with encephalitis of unknown origin may benefit from early viral metagenomics testing as a single step approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据