4.7 Article

Teriparatide Promotes Bone Healing in Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 38, 期 26, 页码 2971-+

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.02192

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [1030371]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is an infrequent but morbid and potentially serious condition associated with antiresorptive and antiangiogenic therapies. Although MRONJ can be prevented by optimizing oral health, management of established cases is supportive and remains challenging. Teriparatide, an osteoanabolic agent that improves bone healing in preclinical studies and in chronic periodontitis, represents a potential treatment option. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, 34 participants with established MRONJ, with a total of 47 distinct MRONJ lesions, were allocated to either 8 weeks of subcutaneous teriparatide (20 mu g/day) or placebo injections, in addition to calcium and vitamin D supplementation and standard clinical care. Participants were observed for 12 months, with primary outcomes that included the clinical and radiologic resolution of MRONJ lesions. Secondary outcomes included osteoblastic responses as measured biochemically and radiologically and changes in quality of life. RESULTS Teriparatide was associated with a greater rate of resolution of MRONJ lesions (odds ratio [OR], 0.15v0.40;P= .013), and 45.4% of lesions resolved by 52 weeks compared with 33.3% in the placebo group. Teriparatide was also associated with reduced bony defects at week 52 (OR, 8.1;P= .017). The incidence of adverse events was balanced between groups, including nausea, anorexia, and musculoskeletal pain, most of mild severity. CONCLUSION Teriparatide improves the rate of resolution of MRONJ lesions and represents an efficacious and safe treatment for it.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据