4.7 Article

Saliva Iodine Concentration in Children and Its Association with Iodine Status and Thyroid Function

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 105, 期 9, 页码 E3451-E3459

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa471

关键词

saliva iodine; iodine status; thyroid function

资金

  1. Basic Research Support Project of Tianjin Medical University [2017KJ235]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: The effectiveness of saliva iodine concentration (SIC) in evaluating iodine status in children is not clear. Objective: We aimed to explore associations between SIC and assessed indicators of iodine status and thyroid function. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Primary schools in Shandong, China. Participants: Local children aged 8 to 13 years with no known thyroid disease were recruited to this study. Main outcome measures: Blood, saliva, and urine samples were collected to evaluate thyroid function and iodine status. Results: SIC positively correlated with spot urinary iodine concentration (r = 0.29, P < 0.0001), 24-hour urinary iodine concentration (r = 0.35, P < 0.0001), and 24-hour urinary iodine excretion (r = 0.40, P < 0.0001). The prevalence of thyroid nodules (TN) and goiter showed an upward trend with SIC quantiles (P for trend < 0.05). Children with SIC <105 mu g/L had a higher risk of insufficient iodine status (OR = 4.18; 95% CI, 2.67-6.56) compared with those with higher SIC. Those having SIC >273 mu g/L were associated with greater risks of TN (OR = 2.70; 95% CI, 1.38-5.26) and excessive iodine status (OR = 18.56; 95% CI, 5.66-60.91) than those with lower SIC values. Conclusions: There is a good correlation between SIC and urinary iodine concentrations. It is of significant reference value for the diagnosis of iodine deficiency with SIC of less than 105 mu g/L and for the diagnosis of iodine excess and TN with SIC of more than 273 mu g/L. Given the sanitary nature and convenience of saliva iodine collection, SIC is highly recommended as a good biomarker of recent iodine status in school-aged children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据