4.7 Article

A novel hybrid air quality early-warning system based on phase-space reconstruction and multi-objective optimization: A case study in China

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 260, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121027

关键词

Hybrid air quality early-warning system; Variational mode decomposition; Phase space reconstruction; Multi-objective grasshopper optimization algorithm; Fuzzy evaluation

资金

  1. Major Program of National Social Science Foundation of China [17ZDA093]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the haze pollution occurred frequently in recent years, establishing an effective air quality early-warning system has become the top priority. Nowadays, researchers have provided numerous methods for air quality early-warning. However, the majority of studies ignores the significance of data preprocessing and air quality evaluation while designing an early-warning system, which leads to poor forecasting performance and insufficient information. A novel hybrid air quality early-warning system that consists of three modules: data preprocessing, forecasting and air quality evaluation module is designed in this paper. Aiming at extract chaotic characteristics of raw data, a new hybrid data preprocessing strategy is firstly developed to construct a more stable series of pollutant data for forecasting. Then a multi-objective grasshopper optimization algorithm is adopted in order to enhance the forecasting capability of accuracy and stability in the forecasting module. Moreover, a fuzzy evaluation module of air quality is proposed to provide comprehensive results for the system. Through the eighteen data sets' experimental process, the results and discussions indicate that not only the forecasting method achieves higher accuracy and stronger stability than other comparison models, but also the evaluation module provides sufficient air quality information, which forms a scientific guidance to decision-makers against air pollution. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据