4.7 Article

Pretreatment for the recovery of spent lithium ion batteries: theoretical and practical aspects

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 263, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121439

关键词

Spent lithium ion batteries; Pretreatment; Low-temperature volatilization; Industrial application; Theoretical analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51804342]
  2. Innovation-Driven Project of Central South University [2020CX038]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2019JJ50805]
  4. Scientific Research Starting Foundation of Central South University [218041]
  5. Key Laboratory of Hunan Province for Clean and Efficient Utilization of Strategic Calcium-containing Mineral Resources [2018TP1002]
  6. Co-Innovation Centre for Clean and Efficient Utilization of Strategic Metal Mineral Resources

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanism and application of a safe and clean process of pretreatment for the disposal of spent lithium ion batteries (LIBs) were investigated in this study. Crushing experiments indicate that spent LIBs can be crushed without discharging using a refitted shear crusher. To remove and recycle the electrolytes, the crushed LIBs were subjected to low-temperature volatilization at 120 degrees C for 150 min. The results of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis indicated that 99.32% of organic electrolytes and 99.93% of LiPF6 were recycled from the LIBs via volatilization. X-ray diffraction and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses indicated that a little quantity of organic electrolytes was retained in the solid products after volatilization. Meanwhile, LiNi0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2 and C were not destroyed, and the F elements contained in the solid products mainly existed in the form of harmless LiF and polyvinylidene difluoride. Finally, industrial-scale experiments shown that the pretreatment is a promising technology for recycling of spent LIBs. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据