4.6 Article

Simultaneous determination of nine perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids by a series of amide acetals derivatization and gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1622, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461132

关键词

Perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids; Derivatization; Amide acetals; Gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

资金

  1. Science and Technology Project funding of Hebei province of China [17275503D]
  2. National Key Technologies Research and Development Program of China [2017YFF0211304]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel and simple derivatization method using a series of amide acetals as derivatization reagents, along with gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) analysis, were developed and validated for simultaneous determination of 9 perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs) in this study. The structures and fragmentation pathway of PFCAs derivatives were deduced and verified. The derivatization method developed in this study improved the sensitivity of the detection of PFCAs by GC. The applicability of 6 amide acetals for the derivatization of PFCAs was demonstrated. Derivatization conditions for 9 PFCAs were optimized with addition of 20 mu L of derivatization reagent and reaction at 35 degrees C for 30 min. 9 PFCAs derivatives were confirmed to be stable over 15 days. The instrument detection limits (IDLs) were lower than 0.01 pg/mu L. The intra and inter-day precisions were below 4.06% and 5.48%, respectively. To demonstrate the utility of the derivatization method, the level of PFCAs in the marine products were detected. The alkaline digestion followed by solid-phase extraction (SPE) cleanup method was used for pretreatment. The method detection limits (MDLs) ranged from 0.04 to 0.10 ng/g, and the spiked recoveries ranged between 54.72% and 107.29%, with relative standard deviation (RSD) of 1.53%-11.89%. Five PFCAs were detected in the range of 0.66 to 499.03 ng/g dry weight. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据