4.6 Article

Enantiomeric determination of econazole and sulconazole by electrokinetic chromatography using hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin combined with ionic liquids based on L-lysine and L-glutamic acid

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1621, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461085

关键词

Electrokinetic chromatography; Amino acid based chiral ionic liquids; Cyclodextrin; Enantioseparation; Econazole; Sulconazole

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) [CTQ2016-76368-P]
  2. Comunidad of Madrid
  3. FSE [S2018/BAA-4393]
  4. FEDER [S2018/BAA-4393]
  5. MINECO [RYC2013-12688]
  6. University of Alcala

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two analytical methodologies based on the combined use of hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin and two different amino acid-based chiral ionic liquids (tetrabutylammonium-L-lysine or tetrabutylammonium-L-glutamic acid) in electrokinetic chromatography were developed in this work to perform the enantios-elective determination of econazole and sulconazole in pharmaceutical formulations. The influence of different experimental variables such as buffer concentration, applied voltage, nature and concentration of the ionic liquid, temperature and injection time, on the enantiomeric separation was investigated. The combination of hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin and tetrabutylammonium-L-lysine under the optimized conditions enabled to achieve the enantiomeric determination of both drugs with high enantiomeric resolution (3.5 for econazole and 2.4 for sulconazole). The analytical characteristics of the developed methodologies were evaluated in terms of linearity, precision, LOD, LOQ and recovery showing good performance for the determination of both drugs which were successfully quantitated in pharmaceutical formulations. This work reports the first analytical methodology enabling the enantiomeric determination of sulconazole in pharmaceutical formulations. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据