4.6 Article

One pot green synthesis of m-aminophenol-urea-glyoxal resin as pipette tip solid-phase extraction adsorbent for simultaneous determination of four plant hormones in watermelon juice

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1623, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461214

关键词

One pot fabrication; Resin adsorbent; Pipette tip solid-phase extraction; Plant hormones; Watermelon juice

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [B2018201270, H2019201288]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21575033]
  3. Talent Engineering Training Foundation of Hebei Province [A201802002]
  4. Post-graduate's Innovation Fund Project of Hebei University [hbu2019ss073]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant hormones (PHs) are a type of pesticide that can potentially affect human health. Therefore, their quantitative detection is particularly important. In this study, a green and economic method for the simultaneous extraction and determination of four PHs, namely thidiazuron, forchlorfenuron, 1-naphthylacetic acid, and 2-naphthoxyacetic acid, in watermelon juice was developed by using m-aminophenol-urea-glyoxal resin as the adsorbent for pipette tip solid phase extraction (PT-SPE) coupled with liquid chromatography. The resin was synthesized via a simple (one pot hydrothermal synthesis) and green (ethanol as the solvent and glyoxal as crosslinking agent) process. The synthesized resin possesses multiple functional groups (hydroxyl, amino, and imino, among others), high adsorption capacity, larger specific surface area than the urea-glyoxal resin and m-aminophenol-glyoxal resin, and can be regenerated easily. The PT-SPE device is simple, cheap, and easy to obtain, and the adsorbent dosage is only 5.0 mg. The proposed method has a wide linear detection range, high recovery, good precision, and high sensitivity, and satisfies the measurement requirements for detecting trace levels of PHs in fruits and vegetables. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据