4.5 Article

Ethics and Systems Thinking in Biochemistry: A CRISPR-Based Activity for Undergraduate Students

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION
卷 97, 期 7, 页码 1944-1950

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00095

关键词

First-Year Undergraduate/General; Biochemistry; Collaborative/Cooperative Learning; Communication/Writing; Inquiry-Based/Discovery Learning; Multimedia-Based Learning; Applications of Chemistry; Biotechnology; Nonmajor Courses

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This inquiry-based activity introduces students to the CRISPR method of genetic engineering and recent applications of CRISPR-editing. This activity was implemented in a nonmajors chemistry course for first-year students, during a 1 h 50 min laboratory period. However, the activity could easily be adapted, and it is useful for meeting scientific literacy learning goals of a college chemistry course for majors, an introductory college biochemistry course, or an advanced high school chemistry or biology course. For the activity, students self-selected into small groups and then researched a particular topic concerning CRISPR using a series of questions designed to guide their discovery work. Subtopics included both biochemical and application details of CRISPR, as well as social and ethical considerations concerning the genetic engineering of humans. The activity was designed to introduce students to this rapidly burgeoning biochemical method using a systems-based analysis in which social and ethical considerations are considered along with technical details. Groups prepared a short written and oral summary of their findings, and the instructor facilitated a class discussion on the topic following group oral presentations. Pre- and postactivity survey analysis indicated that students found the activity worthwhile and were able to reflect on the potential broader social and ethical implications of CRISPR-editing due to the research and discussions facilitated by the activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据