4.7 Article

Light-emitting diode irradiation induces AKT/mTOR-mediated apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer cells and xenograft mouse model

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 236, 期 2, 页码 1362-1374

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.29943

关键词

AKT; mTOR pathway; apoptosis; LED irradiation; pancreatic cancer; tumor growth

资金

  1. Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) - Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI17C2397]
  2. Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science ICT [NRF-2017M3A9E9032772]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that blue LED irradiation suppressed pancreatic cancer cell and tumor growth by regulating the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway, while also increasing the expression of apoptosis-related proteins. These findings suggest that blue LEDs could be utilized as a nonpharmacological treatment for pancreatic cancer.
The beneficial effects of light-emitting diode (LED) irradiation have been reported in various pathologies, including cancer. However, its effect in pancreatic cancer cells remains unclear. Herein, we demonstrated that blue LED of 460 nm regulated pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis by suppressing the expression of apoptosis-related factors, such as mutant p53 and B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2), and decreasing the expression of RAC-beta serine/threonine kinase 2 (AKT2), the phosphorylation of protein kinase B (AKT), and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR). Blue LED irradiation also increased the levels of cleaved poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and caspase-3 in pancreatic cancer cells, while it suppressed AKT2 expression and inhibited tumor growth in xenograft tumor tissues. In conclusion, blue LED irradiation suppressed pancreatic cancer cell and tumor growth by regulating AKT/mTOR signaling. Our findings indicated that blue LEDs could be used as a nonpharmacological treatment for pancreatic cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据