4.7 Review

COVID-19 and olfactory dysfunction: A possible associative approach towards neurodegenerative diseases

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 236, 期 2, 页码 763-770

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.29937

关键词

COVID-19; neurodegenerative disorders; neuroinflammation; olfactory bulb dysfunction; SARS-CoV-2 neuroinvasion

资金

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board [ECR/2016/001688]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 has caused global concern due to its severe life-threatening conditions. COVID-19 symptoms like fever, sore throat, and shortness of breath are common, and anecdotal reports suggest potential effects on the central nervous system, including neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative disorders like anosmia and hyposmia. Further research is needed to understand the full extent of the virus's impact on the brain and potential long-term consequences.
The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the agent of novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19), has kept the globe in disquiets due to its severe life-threatening conditions. The most common symptoms of COVID-19 are fever, sore throat, and shortness of breath. According to the anecdotal reports from the health care workers, it has been suggested that the virus could reach the brain and can cause anosmia, hyposmia, hypogeusia, and hypopsia. Once the SARS-CoV-2 has entered the central nervous system (CNS), it can either exit in an inactive form in the tissues or may lead to neuroinflammation. Here, we aim to discuss the chronic infection of the olfactory bulb region of the brain by SARS-CoV-2 and how this could affect the nearby residing neurons in the host. We further review the probable cellular mechanism and activation of the microglia 1 phenotype possibly leading to various neurodegenerative disorders. In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2 might probably infect the olfactory bulb neuron enervating the nasal epithelium accessing the CNS and might cause neurodegenerative diseases in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据