4.5 Review

Autophagy regulation is an effective strategy to improve the prognosis of chemically induced acute liver injury based on experimental studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 24, 期 15, 页码 8315-8325

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.15565

关键词

acute liver injury; autophagy; liver regeneration; mechanism; mesenchymal stem cell

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81700553]
  2. Zhejiang Basic Public Welfare Research Program [LGF20H030008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute liver injury (ALI) induced by chemicals in current experimental studies is characterized by inflammation, oxidative stress and necrosis, which can greatly influence the long-term outcome and lead to liver failure. In liver cells, different autophagy forms envelop cytoplasm components, including proteins, endoplasmic reticulum (ER), mitochondria and lipids, and they effectively participate in breaking down the cargo enclosed inside lysosomes to replenish cellular energy and contents. In general, autophagy serves as a cell survival mechanism in stressful microenvironments, but it also serves as a destructive mechanism that results in cell death in vitro and in vivo. In experimental animals, multiple chemicals are used to mimic ALI in patients to clarify the potential pathological mechanisms and develop effective strategies in the clinic. In this review, we summarize related publications about autophagy modulation to attenuate chemically induced ALI in vitro and in vivo. We also analysed the underlying mechanisms of autophagy regulators and genetic modifications to clarify how to control autophagy to protect against chemically induced ALI in animal models. We anticipate that selectively controlling the dual effects of hepatic autophagy will help to protect against ALI in various animals, but the detailed mechanisms and effects should be determined further in future studies. In this way, we are more confident that modulating autophagy in liver regeneration can improve the prognosis of ALI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据