4.5 Article

Quantitative proteomics identified 3 oxidative phosphorylation genes with clinical prognostic significance in gastric cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 24, 期 18, 页码 10842-10854

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.15712

关键词

biomarkers; DIA; gastric cancer; metabolic network

资金

  1. Research Foundation of Health and Family Planning Commission of Hubei Province [WJ2015MA010, WJ2017M249]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2015CFA027]
  3. First Hospital of Lanzhou University [ldyyyn2018-13, ldyyyn2018-43, ldyyyn2018-66]
  4. Health Research Plan Management Project of Gansu Province [GWGL2010-20]
  5. Gansu Colleges and Universities Innovation Fund Project [2019B-009, 2020B009]
  6. Clinical Medical Research Center of Peritoneal Cancer of Wuhan [2015060911020462]
  7. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81072152, 81770283]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present study was to explore the underlying mechanisms involved in gastric cancer (GC) formation using data-independent acquisition (DIA) quantitative proteomics analysis. We identified the differences in protein expression and related functions involved in biological metabolic processes in GC. Totally, 745 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were found in GC tissuesvs. gastric normal tissues. Despite enormous complexity in the details of the underlying regulatory network, we find that clusters of proteins from the DEPs were mainly involved in 38 pathways. All of the identified DEPs involved in oxidative phosphorylation were down-regulated. Moreover, GC possesses significantly altered biological metabolic processes, such as NADH dehydrogenase complex assembly and tricarboxylic acid cycle, which is mostly consistent with that in KEGG analysis. Furthermore the higher expression of UQCRQ, NDUFB7 and UQCRC2 were positively correlated with a better prognosis, implicating these proteins may as novel candidate diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据