4.5 Article

Melatonin against acute ischaemic stroke dependently via suppressing both inflammatory and oxidative stress downstream signallings

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 24, 期 18, 页码 10402-10419

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.15654

关键词

inflammation; ischaemic stroke; melatonin; oxidative stress; Toll-like receptors

资金

  1. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital [CMRPG8H0061]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study tested the hypothesis that melatonin (Mel) therapy preserved the brain architectural and functional integrity against ischaemic stroke (IS) dependently through suppressing the inflammatory/oxidative stress downstream signalling pathways. Adult male B6 (n = 6 per each B6 group) and TLR4 knockout (ie TLR4(-/-)) (n = 6 per each TLR4(-/-)group) mice were categorized into sham control (SCB6), SCTLR4-/-, ISB6, ISTLR4-/-, ISB6 + Mel (i.p. daily administration) and ISTLR4-/-+ Mel (i.p. daily administration). By day 28 after IS, the protein expressions of inflammatory (HMBG1/TLR2/TLR4/MAL/MyD88/RAM TRIF/TRAF6/IKK-alpha/p-NF-kappa B/nuclear-NF-kappa B/nuclear-IRF-3&7/IL-1 beta/IL-6/TNF-alpha/IFN-gamma) and oxidative stress (NOX-1/NOX-2/ASK1/p-MKK4&7/p-JNK/p-c-JUN) downstream pathways as well as mitochondrial-damaged markers (cytosolic cytochrome C/cyclophilin D/SRP1/autophagy) were highest in group ISB6, lowest in groups SC(B6)and SCTLR4-/-, lower in group ISTLR4-/-+ Mel than in groups IS(TLR4-/-)and ISB6 + Mel and lower in group ISB6 + Mel than in group ISTLR4-/-(allP < .0001). The brain infarct volume, brain infarct area and the number of inflammatory cells in brain (CD14/F4-88) and in circulation (MPO+//Ly6C+/CD11b+//Ly6G+/CD11b+) exhibited an identical pattern, whereas the neurological function displayed an opposite pattern of inflammatory protein expression among the six groups (allP < .0001). In conclusion, TLR inflammatory and oxidative stress signallings played crucial roles for brain damage and impaired neurological function after IS that were significantly reversed by Mel therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据