4.2 Article

Bivalirudin for Maintenance Anticoagulation During Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19

期刊

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.06.059

关键词

Bivalirudin; Direct thrombin inhibitors; Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; ECMO; Coronavirus disease; COVID; Extracorporeal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In severe cases of COVID-19, ECMO support may be necessary, and using bivalirudin for anticoagulation strategy during ECMO may offer advantages, including achieving therapeutic anticoagulation intensity rapidly.
In its severe manifestation, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) compromises oxygenation in a manner that is refractory to maximal conventional support and requires escalation to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Maintaining ECMO support for extended durations requires a delicately balanced anticoagulation strategy to maintain circuit viability by preventing thrombus deposition while avoiding excessive anticoagulation yielding hemorrhage -a task that is complicated in COVID-19 secondary to an inherent hypercoagulable state. Bivalirudin, a member of the direct thrombin inhibitor drug class, offers potential advantages during ECMO, including to its ability to exert its effect by directly attaching to and inhibiting freely circulating and fibrin-bound thrombin. Herein, the successful use of an anticoagulation strategy using the off-label use of a continuous infusion of bivalirudin in a case of severe hypoxemic and hypercarbic respiratory failure caused by COVID-19 requiring venovenous ECMO is reported. Importantly, therapeutic anticoagulation intensity was achieved rapidly with stable pharmacokinetics, and there was no need for any circuit interventions throughout the patient's 27-day ECMO course. In COVID-19, bivalirudin offers a potential option for maintaining systemic anticoagulation during ECMO in a manner that may mitigate the prothrombotic nature of the underlying pathophysiologic state. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据