4.7 Article

A Prospective Evaluation of Early Detection Biomarkers for Ovarian Cancer in the European EPIC Cohort

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 22, 期 18, 页码 4664-4675

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0316

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH [R01CA158119]
  2. European Commission (DG-SANCO)
  3. International Agency for Research on Cancer
  4. Danish Cancer Society (Denmark)
  5. Ligue Contre le Cancer (France)
  6. Institut Gustave Roussy (France)
  7. Mutuelle Generale de l'Education Nationale (France)
  8. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM
  9. France)
  10. Deutsche Krebshilfe (Germany)
  11. Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (Germany)
  12. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Germany)
  13. Hellenic Health Foundation (Greece)
  14. Stavros Niarchos Foundation
  15. Italian Association for Research on Cancer (AIRC) (Italy)
  16. National Research Council (Italy)
  17. Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare, and Sports (VWS) (the Netherlands)
  18. Netherlands Cancer Registry (NKR) (the Netherlands)
  19. LK Research Funds (the Netherlands)
  20. Dutch Prevention Funds (the Netherlands)
  21. Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland) (the Netherlands)
  22. World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) (the Netherlands)
  23. Statistics Netherlands (the Netherlands)
  24. Nordforsk, Nordic Centre of Excellence programme on Food, Nutrition, and Health (Norway)
  25. Health Research Fund (FIS) (Spain)
  26. Regional Government of Andalucia (Spain)
  27. Regional Government of Asturias (Spain)
  28. Regional Government of Basque Country (Spain)
  29. Regional Government of Murcia (Spain) [6236]
  30. Regional Government of Navarra (Spain)
  31. ISCIII RETIC (Spain) [RD06/0020]
  32. Swedish Cancer Society (Sweden)
  33. Swedish Scientific Council (Sweden)
  34. Regional Government of Skane (Sweden)
  35. Regional Government of Vasterbotten (Sweden)
  36. Cancer Research UK [14136, C570/A16491]
  37. Medical Research Council (United Kingdom) [G1000143]
  38. [ERC-2009-AdG 232997]
  39. Cancer Research UK [14136, 16491] Funding Source: researchfish
  40. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_13048, G1000143, MR/N003284/1, MC_U106179471, G0401527, MC_UU_12015/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  41. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10114] Funding Source: researchfish
  42. MRC [MC_UU_12015/1, MR/N003284/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: About 60% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed at late stage, when 5-year survival is less than 30% in contrast to 90% for local disease. This has prompted search for early detection biomarkers. For initial testing, specimens taken months or years before ovarian cancer diagnosis are the best source of information to evaluate earlydetection biomarkers. Here we evaluate the most promising ovarian cancer screening biomarkers in prospectively collected samples from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. Experimental Design: We measured CA125, HE4, CA72.4, and CA15.3 in 810 invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 1,939 controls. We calculated the sensitivity at 95% and 98% specificity as well as area under the receiver operator curve (C-statistic) for each marker individually and in combination. In addition, we evaluated marker performance by stage at diagnosis and time between blood draw and diagnosis. Results: We observed the best discrimination between cases and controls within 6 months of diagnosis for CA125 (C-statistic = 0.92), then HE4 (0.84), CA72.4 (0.77), and CA15.3 (0.73). Marker performance declined with longer time between blood draw and diagnosis and for earlier staged disease. However, assessment of discriminatory ability at early stage was limited by small numbers. Combinations of markers performed modestly, but significantly better than any single marker. Conclusions: CA125 remains the single best marker for the early detection of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, but can be slightly improved by combining with other markers. Identifying novel markers for ovarian cancer will require studies including larger numbers of early-stage cases. (C) 2016 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据