4.2 Article

Genome-wide analysis of chemosensory protein genes in the small white butterfly Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae)

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASIA-PACIFIC ENTOMOLOGY
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 772-780

出版社

KOREAN SOC APPLIED ENTOMOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.aspen.2020.07.005

关键词

Chemosensory protein; Insect olfaction; Gene identification; Genomic distribution; Expression pattern

资金

  1. Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation [1908085MC70]
  2. Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Universities in Anhui Province [KJ2016A226]
  3. Key Projects of China National Tobacco Corporation Sichuan Company [SCYC201703, SCYC201806]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemosensory proteins (CSPs) play a crucial role in olfactory recognition in insects. The small white butterfly Pieris rapae a major pest of Brassicaceae vegetables, which causes enormous economic losses uses olfaction to locate its host plants. However, the molecular mechanism of olfaction in this species remains unknown. Herein, we performed a genome-wide and transcriptome-wide analysis of CSP genes in P. rapae and identified 21 CSPs (PrapCSP1 to PrapCSP21). Proteins encoded by these genes showed typical characteristics of CSPs an N-terminal signal peptide and four positionally conserved cysteine residues. BLASTX analysis indicated that most P. rapae CSPs showed high amino acid identity with their respective orthologs in other lepidopterans. Phylogenetic analysis showed that most P. rapae CSPs were well segregated and were clustered into different branches. The 21 genes were located on six genomic scaffolds, and most genes were tandemly arrayed. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR showed that PrapCSP3, 4, 16 and 21 had the highest expression level in the antennae; PrapCSP7 and PrapCSP18 were mainly expressed in the ovaries, and PrapCSP9 and PrapCSP17 were leg-enriched. PrapCSP11 and PrapCSP20 were found mainly in the heads and testes, respectively. Our findings provide a solid foundation for studying the function of these genes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据