4.6 Article

Reduced graphene oxide/silica nanocomposite-reinforced anticorrosive fluorocarbon coating

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 138, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.49689

关键词

coatings; electrochemistry; graphene and fullerenes; nanotubes; surfaces and interfaces

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFD1101200, 2019YFD1101204]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [51772150]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu Province [BE2017006-4, BE2018008-1]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The modified graphene oxide-silica (M-rGO/SiO2) nanocomposite filler, prepared with a coupling agent, showed excellent dispersion in the FEVE coating and extended the corrosion path efficiently. The M-rGO/SiO2-reinforced FEVE coating exhibited enhanced anti-corrosion properties with a high protection efficiency of up to 95.18% maintained over a 30-day test cycle.
Reduced graphene oxide-silica (rGO/SiO2) nanocomposite filler was prepared with a ball milling process and then modified using a coupling agent of NH2C3H6Si(OC2H5)(3)(KH-550) to improve its dispersion in the fluoroethylene vinyl ether (FEVE) coating. The surface properties and morphologies of the modified rGO/SiO2(M-rGO/SiO2) nanocomposite filler and M-rGO/SiO2-reinforced FEVE coating were characterized by using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and Tafel polarization curves were applied to illustrate the corrosion resistance of the coating. The results showed that the M-rGO/SiO(2)composite can disperse well in the coating and efficiently extend the corrosion path, enhancing the anti-corrosion property of the FEVE coating. Therefore, the |Z|(0.01 Hz)of M-rGO/SiO(2)reinforced FEVE coating maintained at around 10(10) omega center dot cm(2)in the 30 days test cycle and a protection efficiency of up to 95.18% was achieved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据