4.7 Article

Intratumor Heterogeneity of Homologous Recombination Deficiency in Primary Breast Cancer

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 1193-1199

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0889

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  2. German Research Foundation [WA 3514/2-1]
  3. American Society of Breast Surgeons Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The 3-biomarker homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) assay measures the number of telomeric allelic imbalances, loss of heterozygosity, and large-scale state transitions in tumor DNA and combines these metrics into a single score that reflects DNA repair deficiency. The goal of this study is to assess the consistency of these HRD measures in different biopsies from distinct areas of the same cancer. Experimental Design: HRD scores, BRCA mutation status, and BRCA1 promoter methylation were assessed in 99 samples from 33 surgically resected, stage I-III breast cancers; each cancer was biopsied in three distinct areas. Homologous recombination repair (HR) deficiency was defined as either high HRD score (>= 42) or tumor BRCA mutation. Results: Eighty-one biopsies from 32 cancers were analyzed. Tumor BRCA status was available for all samples, HRD scores for 70, and BRCA1 methylation values for 76 samples. The BRCA1/2 mutation and promoter methylation status and HR category showed perfect concordance across all biopsies from the same cancer. All tumors with BRCA1/2 mutations or promoter methylation had high HRD scores, as did 17% (4/24) of the BRCA1/2 wild-type and nonmethylated tumors. The HRD scores were also highly consistent between different biopsies from the same tumor with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.977, indicating that only 2.3% of the variance is attributed to within-tumor biopsy-to-biopsy variation. Conclusions: These results indicate that within-tumor spatial heterogeneity for HRD metrics and the technical noise in the assay are small and do not influence HRD scores and HR status. (C)2016 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据