4.7 Article

Enhanced capacitive performances and excellent stability of cadmium-sulfide-concealed nickel sulfide (Ni3S2/CdS) for electrochemical capacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 826, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154211

关键词

Supercapacitor; Ni3S2/CdS; Capacity; Cycling stability; Hybrid

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [2018R1D1A3B05042787]
  2. Human Resources Program in Energy Technology of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea [20174030201760]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Active materials with distinct structures significantly influence the electrochemical properties of supercapacitors. Herein, hierarchical cadmium-sulfide-concealed nickel sulfide (Ni3S2/CdS) nanostructures have been successfully grown on nickel foam using hydrothermal synthesis followed by successive ionic layer adsorption and reaction deposition. The resulting Ni3S2/CdS electrode exhibited a high specific capacity (545.6C g(-1) at 1 A g(-1)) and outstanding cycling stability (capacity retention of 103% after 5000 charge-discharge cycles at a current density of 5 A g(-1)). This is because of the combined synergistic advantages of Ni3S2 (high specific capacity) and CdS (superior mechanical stability). Furthermore, a hybrid supercapacitor assembled using the Ni3S2/CdS cathode and an activated carbon anode showed a notable specific capacitance of 109 Fg(-1) at 1 A g(-1) and a capacitance retention of 110% after 5000 cycles, signifying excellent long-term cycling life. The hybrid supercapacitor exhibited a significantly high energy density of 34 Wh kg(-1) with the power density of 748.8 W kg(-1) at the current density of 1 A g(-1). The above results suggest that the Ni3S2/CdS bilayer can be a prospective candidate for supercapacitors. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据