4.7 Article

Turning the activity of Cr-Ce mixed oxide towards thermocatalytic NO oxidation and photocatalytic CO2 reduction via the formation of yolk shell structure hollow microspheres

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 829, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154508

关键词

Cr-Ce mixed oxides; Double-shelled hollow structure; Multifunctional catalysis; Low-temperature NO oxidation; CO2 photocatalytic reduction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51808296, 51802160]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20170938, BK20150892]
  3. 63rd Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M630487]
  4. Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of NUIST [2243141601034, S8113082001]
  5. WECHAT group Energetic and Progressive Mightyboy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cr-Ce mixed oxides microspheres will have considerable potential in thermocatalytic NO oxidation and photocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) if their low porosity and expensive synthetic expenditure can be overcome. To avoid these obstacles, a facile and economical strategy was adopted to synthesize double-shelled hollow Cr-Ce mixed oxide microspheres. The highly active multipurpose catalyst achieved an ultrahigh thermocatalytic NO oxidation efficiency at low temperatures, and provided high yields of CH4 and CH3OH during the photocatalytic CO2RR. For NO oxidation, the optimized catalyst provided over 40% NO removal at 150 degrees C, which was ascribed to the reduced aggregation of the active subunits and the increased active species availability. Further, the exposed surface could generate an increased content of Cr6+ and O-beta, which played the key role in NO oxidation. For CO2 photocatalytic reduction, the superior behavior originated from the reduced band gap and the effective separation of photoinduced charge carriers. This study opens up new possibilities of using Cr-Ce mixed oxides for application in catalysis. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据