4.7 Article

The evolution of long-period stacking ordered phase and its effect on dynamic recrystallization in Mg-Gd-Y-Zn-Zr alloy processed by repetitive upsetting-extrusion

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 828, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154454

关键词

LPSO phase; Mg-RE alloy; Repetitive upsetting-extrusion; Microstructure; Dynamic recrystallization

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province, China [201901D111176]
  2. Key R&D program of Shanxi Province, China (International Cooperation) [201903D421036]
  3. Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi, China [2018002]
  4. Graduate Education Innovation Program of Shanxi Province, China [2019SY416]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Based on the repetitive upsetting-extrusion (RUE) process, the evolution of the LPSO phase and its effect on the dynamic recrystallization (DRX) of Mg-9Gd-4Y-2Zn-0.5Zr (wt%) alloy during the multi-pass deformation were studied. The results showed that with the increase of RUE processing, the DRX fraction gradually increased, the grains were effectively refined, and the texture was weakened. The lamellar LPSO phase mainly underwent mechanical crushing, bending, tearing, and kinking to become refinement. The block-shaped LPSO phases dissolved during the deformation process, forming a stripe-like structure, and its rest of the refinement mechanism was similar to the lamellar phase. The refinement of block-shaped phase was slower than that of lamellar phase. However, the block-shaped phases always promoted DRX through the PSN mechanism, while the lamellar phases with a large volume inhibited the generation of DRX. After the refinement of lamellar phases, the inhibition effect was transformed into the promotion effect, which leaded to a continuous increase in the DRX fraction. This further promoted the uniform distribution of the LPSO phases and obtained a more ideal microstructure. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据