4.7 Article

Morphology and structure control of amine-functionalized graphene/polyaniline composite for high-performance supercapacitors

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 827, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.154390

关键词

Amine-functionalized graphene; Polyaniline; Composites; Supercapacitors; Energy storage materials

资金

  1. Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51472166]
  2. Liaoning BaiQianWan Talents Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the past few years, supercapacitors based on graphene/polyaniline (rGO/PANI) composites have gained immense attention. The electrochemical performance of rGO/PANI composites can be improved by controlling their morphology and structure. However, very few studies have been carried out on amine-functionalized graphene/polyaniline (F-rGO/PANI) composites. In this study, amine-functionalized graphene (F-rGO) and mesoporous graphene (PF-rGO) were composited with PANI. The results showed that the specific capacitance of the F-rGO/PANI composites could be improved by controlling their morphology. The mesoporous structure of F-rGO contributed to the improvement in the cycling stability and energy density of the composites. At a current density of 0.5 A g(-1), the specific capacitances of F-rGO/ PANI(20-0.5h) and PF-rGO/PANI are 597 F g(-1) and 489 F g(-1), respectively; these values are remarkably higher than that of pure PANI (400 F g(-1)). F-rGO/PANI(20-0.5th) and PF-rGO/PANI maintained specific capacitances of 75% and 89%, respectively, which were significantly higher than that of pure PANI; this was observed even after 2000 cycles of charge and discharge had been completed at a current density of 1 A g(-1). The energy density of PF-rGO/PANI reaches 34.9 W h kg(-1) at the power density of 1.27 kW kg(-1). This study is expected to provide an effective basis for the future research of graphene-based composite electrode materials for supercapacitors. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据