4.7 Article

Gas exfoliation of graphitic carbon nitride to improve the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution of metal-free 2D/2D g-C3N4/graphdiyne heterojunction

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 833, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.155054

关键词

Gas exfoliation; Graphitic carbon nitride; 2D/2D; G-C3N4/graphdiyne heterojunction; Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution

资金

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of Hebei Province [B2019210358]
  2. State Education Ministry and Hebei Key Discipline Construction Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metal-free photocatalysts have received increasing attention as nonmetal elements are abundant in the earth and friendly to the environment. Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) as a typical two-dimensional (2D) metal-free photocatalysts for water splitting has attracted increasing interest due to its economic production and environmentally friend features. However, the high photocarriers recombination rate constraint its catalytic activity. Combining the single-or few-layered g-C3N4 nanosheets with other 2D functional materials to form efficient metal-free heterojunction photocatalysts is one of the effective strategies to improve the photocarriers separation. Herein, we introduce a simple and efficient method to scalable preparation few-layered g-C3N4 nanosheets using gas exfoliation of bulk g-C3N4 in liquid nitrogen. Then we introduce the g-C3N4 nanosheets into construct a 2D/2D heterojunction of g-C3N4/graphdiyne by pi-pi interaction, where graphdiyne (GDY) as a new 2D carbon allotrope, has excellent holes transfer nature. We find that the 2D/2D g-C3N4/GDY photocatalyst with 1% GDY is the optimum condition, with the highest H2 evolution rate of 454.28 mmol h(-1). The superior photocatalytic performance may be attributed to the excellent photocarriers separation in g-C3N4 under the built-in field, where GDY can rapid transport holes from g-C3N4 to the sacrificial agents. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据