4.7 Article

Polymer-Coated Hydroxyapatite Nanocarrier for Double-Stranded RNA Delivery

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 68, 期 25, 页码 6811-6818

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02182

关键词

hydroxyapatite nanoparticles; RNAi; dsRNA; polyarginine; layer-by-layer; SF9 cells; gene knockdown; endosomal escape

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [R21AI131427]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conventional synthetic insecticides have limited success due to insect resistance and negative effects on off-target biota and the environment. Although RNA interference (RNAi) is a tool that is becoming more widely utilized in pest control products, naked dsRNA has limited success in most taxa. Nanocarriers have shown promising results in enhancing the efficacy of this tool. In this study, we used a layer-by-layer electrostatic assembly where we synthesized poly(acrylic acid) (PAA)-coated hydroxyapatite (HA) nanoparticles (PAA-HA NPs) as inorganic nanocarriers, which were then coated with a layer of a cationic poly(amino acid), 10 kDa poly-L-arginine (PLR10), to allow for binding of a layer of negatively charged dsRNA. Binding of PLR,PAA-HA NPs to dsRNA was found to increase as the mass ratio of NPs to dsRNA increased. In vitro studies with transgenic SF9 cells (from Spodoptera frugiperda) expressing the firefly luciferase gene showed a significant gene silencing (35% decrease) at a 5:1 NP-to-dsRNA ratio, while naked dsRNA was ineffective at gene silencing. There was a significant concentration-response relationship in knockdown; however, cytotoxicity was observed at higher concentrations. Confocal microscopy studies showed that dsRNA from PLR10-PAA-HA NPs was not localized within endosomes, while naked dsRNA appeared to be entrapped within the endosomes. Overall, polymer-functionalized HA nanocarriers enabled dsRNA to elicit gene knockdown in cells, whereas naked dsRNA was not effective in causing gene knockdown.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据