4.5 Article

Personal Characteristics of e-Bike Riders and Illegal Lane Occupation Behavior

期刊

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION
卷 2020, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1155/2020/1840975

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71861023]
  2. Program of Humanities and Social Science of the Education Ministry of China [18YJC630118]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LQ19E080003]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Ningbo Municipality [2018A610127]
  5. Philosophy and Social Science Program of Ningbo [G20-ZX37]
  6. Foundation of A Hundred Youth Talents Training Program of Lanzhou Jiaotong University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to reveal the potential relationship between personal characteristics of e-bike riders and illegal occupation of motor vehicle lane. To this end, a questionnaire survey was conducted and 350 valid copies of responses were retrieved from the e-bike riders. Depending on the number of motor vehicle lanes occupied, the risky behavior of illegal occupation was divided into four intervals: intervals A, B, C, and D. The disaggregate theory has high adaptability to the analysis of individual traffic behavior. In this study, the multinomial logit model was used, and eight personal characteristics of e-bike riders were selected. The aforementioned four intervals were the four selection limbs, and a measurement model calculating the influence of personal characteristics on the behavior of illegal occupation was built. The theory of elasticity was employed to analyze the sensitivity degree of each influence factor. The results showed that the absolute values of elasticity of all tested influence factors, including age, educational level, and eye vision, were less than 1.000. However, on the four intervals, the elasticity of riders' temperament was 1.203, 1.656, 1.554, and 1.355, respectively, and elasticity of riding proficiency was 2.782, 3.883, 3.453, and 2.932, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据